Showing posts with label Sylvester"Vess" Ossman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sylvester"Vess" Ossman. Show all posts

Friday, March 29, 2019

A Portrait of Frank P. Banta

Today we celebrate the birthday of Frank P. Banta, perhaps the most beloved studio musician of the entire acoustic era. 
It's hard to begin with this guy. 
I guess I could just write out an affectionate bio on him, just because I have gathered more information about him since the last biographical post on him. Well, here goes. 




Frank P. Banta was born on March 29th, 1870, the middle child of five. His father John was a woodcarver, a noble profession in Victorian New York, but perhaps more interesting is his mother's story. His mother  Fannie Darrow married first around 1863, but her first husband died quick, so she remarried an old man named John(Frank's father). Fannie was a rich girl, from a prominent old Dutch family of New Amsterdam. Her many sisters married prominent New York men of money, but she married a poor woodcarver in his middle age. Frank was the only musical child in the family, and it began to show quite early in his life. As a young child, Frank began to take up piano tuning, as his perfect pitch rendered him a skilled tuner. He started tuning pianos in factories, before they were sent off for sale. It was in this line that he began to develop a talent for playing the piano. His mother likely took notice of this tendency soon afterward, and got him some piano lessons. Though, it is likely that he didn't remain under the rule of a teacher for long, as his distinct style developed later proves for little training and more natural ability. 

Frank likely kept tuning pianos in his teen's to get some extra money, and also played some gigs here and there too. By 1888, his name was starting to appear in the papers as a specialty accompanist and arranger. His praises were already being sung before he was even 20. By 1890, he was playing in vaudeville houses all over New York, accompanying singers and instrumentalists of all kinds. Around 1892, Banta became associated with banjoist Vess L. Ossman. 
Ossmand and Banta advertised together, 1893. 

Somehow, in that same year, Banta was plucked out of the vaudeville houses to work for the three year old North American Phonograph Company. It's possible that Edward Issler recommended Banta to the North American/Edison management. Banta spent a few months of 1892 getting the training of phonograph accompaniment. Likely under the rule of Issler, Banta learned the phonograph ropes, and by 1893 was ready to work for them regularly. Other than working regularly with singers and other performers, Banta was often brought into the studios by special request of Vess Ossman, as they were still engaged together as an act at that point. Ossman as many recalled, was a very difficult man to work with. Someone as quiet and modest as Banta likely clashed with him often. Despite that, some of Ossman's best recordings have Banta's accompaniment, as they worked together perfectly in spite of their extreme differences. Banta likely learned how to work with these sort of performers by touring with Ossman, and it would inevitably come in handy as his years in the studios went on. 
Around 1895, Banta formed his own orchestra, a small parlor orchestra of about 6 musicians at most. Considering his close partnership with Issler, he formed this group to the striking likeness of Issler's orchestra. Banta's orchestra even recorded many of Issler's arrangements, such as "The virginia skedaddle", and "Her golden hair was hanging down her back". You can hear one of them below:
Banta is of course the announcer and the pianist. 
Banta' orchestra faded away from record catalogs by 1896, but at that point Banta was secured with Edison. 
By 1896, Banta was with Edison all the time, playing accompaniments for all who worked there, but of course it didn't take long for other companies to jump at him. As his praises continued to be sung by all, the Berliner gramophone company grabbed him in 1897 to replace the increasingly absent Fred Gaisberg. Berliner promised Banta more variety, and his own orchestra again. At Berliner, Banta led the Metropolitan orchestra, or at least sometimes. 
Banta was working for Edison and Berliner at the same time in 1898, seeming to equally balance his time at both. 
He had left the majority of his performing behind at this point, slaving away in two studios seemingly day and night. Some say that during his time recording, Banta was on half the recordings that Edison issued. Half. 

Half would mean thousands, perhaps more than that considering how early he started. 
In 1900, Banta, Arthur Pryor, Christopher Booth, Noble McDonald, and a few more Berliner musicians joined the newly formed Victor company. Each of these musicians made a piano solo for them in 1900 or in the few years afterward. Banta replaced his engagement with Berliner with that of Victor, working at Victor almost as much as he was at Edison. His distinct and steady accompaniments can be heard extremely well on Victors and Edison records during this time. he played everything from classical accompaniments to red hot rag-time. Here are two contrasting examples both from 1901:
His accompaniments are unmistakable, very steady, dynamic, and full of self taught eccentricities. 
His accompaniments influenced many of his fellow jealous recording pianists. Fred Hager and Justin Ring took especial liking to his pieces. 

This oddity of Banta's was only recorded by Hager's orchestra as far as I can find. 
Hager and Ring even mimicked Banta's smooth style of syncopation and dense chord choices in their own accompaniments. 
He continued to somehow balance all that work for Edison and Victor until 1903, where he had nearly completely exhausted himself with this work. 
During his later time at Edison, it was said that Banta's wife Liz worked in the studio as well. Liz was a studio secretary while Frank played accompaniments until he dropped. Frank and Liz married in late 1895, and their first child was the later famous novelty pianist Frank Edgar Banta. Somehow Frank was able to fit in time for another child in 1901, a daughter named Prudence(maybe that's somewhat related to that illusive middle initial of Frank's). 
Frank's children did not get to know him too well. As he was gone more than most men even in that time. Working for two record companies at once wasn't a family friendly concept in those days. 
Only when he became physically weak and ill from all that work did Frank realize this. In mid 1903, Frank was very weary of all this work, but his constant and determined personality dictated his place in the studios. he continued to show up to work every day he could, even though his asthma was getting worse, and time had already aged him quick, even at merely 33. 
Banta at one of Edison's Shoninger pianos, c.1899.

Banta came into work at Edison until the very day before he died. The day before he died in November of 1903, everyone expected him at work the next day as usual, not giving it much thought. But he died early the next morning. 
His absence rendered the piano at Edison silent that day. Legend has it at the Edison studio that no one came to work that day to mourn his death. 

But his story doesn't end there. When Jim Walsh corresponded with Dan W. Quinn in the 1930's, Quinn continued on to praise Banta. It seemed no one was so fond of Banta than Quinn. Quinn even named his youngest child after him. Now that's respect! 
It's Quinn's kind words and recollections about Banta that kept his reputation around, and it was carried on when Frank Edgar Banta was interviewed in the 1940's. Frank Edgar did not know his father well, he regretfully admitted this when asked about it. He recalled little of his father, but he did remember that his father was very humorous, rather quiet, and unfortunately ardent with work. He did recall his father inviting over many friends from work to play new songs(he didn't drop any studio names, but Quinn was almost certainly one of them, as was Ossman). His father would also sit with him at the piano to show him a few things, but these barely made it into his later developed style. 

Frank Edgar was 7 when his father died, and his sister Prudy only 2. 
Liz did not remarry after Frank died, but she continued to work into her old age. 


Well, with that, how about a few records he's on? His story is quite dramatic and somewhat depressing toward the end, so maybe some of his records could lighten the mood a bit here. 


(remember, Banta's name is on the original "Laughing song", he's listed as the arranger)
Banta was likely also responsible for this piece too. 







Happy listening! 


Hope you enjoyed this! 










Sunday, October 21, 2018

The Mystery Box and Blue American records

Well, what a week it's been! 

Hot damn this has been quite a week for records on my end. Whew!
This last Thursday, I took a trip over to my favorite antique store, thinking there may be something there, as I hadn't gone in about a month. I usually like to go to this place once a month or more if there are interesting lots of things to pick through. Never could I have anticipated the sort of things I'd be picking up that day...
This place I go to is one that I have frequented rather often for the last 6 months or so, grabbing piles of records and other old things of interest. I have gotten a ridiculously good stash of records overall from this place, but of course the only records I was getting, or ever saw from this place were disc records. I was just grabbing all the records, asking no questions and remaining modest and quiet when digging and later buying them. Since I've been going so often to this place, the proprietors have become familiar with the the sort of old things I'm looking for. 
After 6 months of stacking up the disc records from this place, with all colors and rarities of the phonographic rainbow, I finally asked the owner if there were any cylindrical records. The moment he told me there were some stashed up in the house(away from the customers poking around), he made me wait a little while. He had to go drop something off for one of the local customers, but with the promise he made, I was so anxious it was hard to maintain my antique store poker face. I waited about 20 minutes poking around mindlessly, as this was after I combed through all the usual spots here. When he came back, he went upstairs to grab a box of cylinders. 
I still was able to keep my cool as I opened the box and saw a few curious French brown waxes that weren't Pathé's. I inspected those thoroughly, and was interested, but of course I had no idea of their value, but I planned to buy them anyway. 
As I kept digging in this box, there were layers of records stacked on one another. There was a curious old looking case right under these French rarities, it looked to be from the 1890's. I was still keeping my poker face pretty constantly at this point, but it broke in a snap when I opened that old box. 
When I saw what was inside I just about screamed, I threw my hands up and nearly tore the 110 year old sleeves on my coat. 
That's what was inside. 
All brown wax, and only one of them was so moldy it can barely be saved. Unfortunately, as I started digging through all the slips and inspecting each record, a percentage of them were broken. But! despite that, I became passionately determined to take them all. That includes every last shard and piece of brown wax I could find. All the old slips were scattered around in the box and I kept looking over those to get some sort of idea of what was in this box. There were some interesting titles there. All the titles were handwritten in pen, in an almost familiar Spencerian script. The most tantalizing slip I saw in the batch was this one here: 
Yep, that's definitely a good sign. 
A brown wax with that title could either have been and original Hunting or a later Jim White take. That writing looks familiar doesn't it?
When I finally got through the box, I took 7 of them home with me after paying the owner. I was too afraid to grab them all at once, as I had a long and somewhat bumpy ride back home. 
I wasn't originally going to do anything the following day, but I became so bubbly over what sort of titles were in the first batch of 7. So the next day I got up early and got over to the place earlier than usual, to grab the rest of the old box of records and go. I spent no extra time this go around, the records needed to get home to be played and correctly identified. Don't get too worried, I only played the announcements and maybe a little more to get what they were and stored them back in their cozy 1890's box. Every one of these beauties was covered in dust, but under the dust, there's no mold or anything, just flawless recordings all from a very specific period of time. 
So after I finally spent several hours trying to get all of these correctly paired with the matching old slips, I got more into the strange circumstances of this almost flawless box of brown wax. 
So here are a few interesting things about this box:
-They are all Columbia's
-All from 1895-1899
-All the slips are written in pen
-there are two of each artist(almost)
-there's a lot of Len Spencer related selections
-no mold anywhere
-all the same shade of brown wax
-there's quite a variety of selections, from sacred to hot rag-time
-all the titles on the slips are abbreviated like Columbia studio slips I've seen

This box was carefully put together. Someone had quite varied tastes in records. These records were originally sold by Allen Koenigsberg, probably over a decade ago to this collector in Berkeley. The collector's name was on lots items I had previously picked up from this place, so without a doubt these brown wax beauties belonged to him at some point. 

Funny accompanying story, when I bought that batch of Berliners and Zon-O-Phone's from this place, I noticed that most of them were kept in distinct yellow sleeves from Kurt Nauck. With that, I contacted Mr. Nauck about these records, and he promptly told me to whom he sold the records. This collector in Berkeley died a few years ago, so it seems that all of these extremely valuable records were dropped off at this antique store I frequent. 

So the fact that these brown waxes came from Koenigsberg would make sense, since they are so outstanding and prime examples of mid-1890's recordings. 

So all of this is great without a doubt, but what was in the mystery box? I spent hours attempting to grab all the titles on these records, and match the slips with the proper record, as they seemed to have been scattered when I found them. At the current time I still have not gotten all the slips to match every single record, as I do not have a very good phonograph to present them in a decent fashion. I have only an 1898 Columbia Q that is definitely not a high quality machine, but I can play brown wax on it safely. So do not expect any transfers from me soon...
The first one I was anxious to play when I got home was of course the "Casey" sketch. That record was far more intriguing and valuable than I could have ever expected. Hunting's records alone are very rare, especially the brown waxes he made. But one thing is for sure, his pre-1897 cylinders are the most desirable of them. Well it turns out that this one in the mystery box was one of them. This cylinder was recorded probably in late-1895 or early 1896, before he got arrested with Charlie Carson for the smut cylinder scandal. It's got that same pristine sound quality as the few Original Hunting's that are online, such as this one:
https://ia802308.us.archive.org/4/items/RussellHunting/RussellHunting-CaseyattheTelephone.mp3
Now think about this, the record I got was recorded right there with Hunting. It was made under his own supervision, it was in the recording room with him, and he recorded directly onto that surface that I can now hold and handle. 

This is exactly why brown wax is so intriguing in a way that no other recordings are. If the record is old enough, it was likely recorded directly on by the recording star who's on it. The record witnessed the musicians and performers in person, and depending on the performer may have been handled by that very performer. This adds a level of personal touch that later records from this time just don't have. This is exactly why this Hunting record in the mystery box is so valuable to me in particular. 

There were several records by Len Spencer in this box. There were as follows:
"What Shall the Harvest Be" from 1896-97
"My Gal is a High Born Lady" with Ossman, 1897
"Crappy Dan" with Ossman, 1897
"-----Honey Boy" with Hylands 1898(I couldn't get the title of this one very well but it's likely something called "Lucinda Does you Love yer Honey Boy?")
Of course since these records are all Columbia's from around the same time, as to be expected, there are quite a few of them with Len Spencer announcements, which is perfectly fine for me!

There were two standout Edward M. Favor records in this box. Usually the Edward Favor records that collectors have are his Zon-O-Phone's from 1900-1903, and his Edison records from the late-1900's. But I assure you these two Favor's were the rarest and most desirable of all the kinds he made. Both of these Favor records are from 1896. They both had that distinct "...of New York City" announcement(as 80 per cent or so of these records have) and that beautiful clear piano accompaniment that was on those Columbia's he made in 1896. The two records sound exactly like this record here:
http://cylinders.library.ucsb.edu/search.php?queryType=@attr+1=1020&num=1&start=1&query=cylinder11859
Same pianist, same recording room, and overall beautiful quality. 
The titles unfortunately I could not make out just yet, and they are hard to match with the remaining slips. 
There was a Gaskin, Steve Porter, and a surprisingly clear Will F. Denny record. 
The Gaskin is a really pretty love song titled "Answer", with that pristine mid-1890's Columbia recording quality. The Steve Porter is an unusual one titled "She Lives on the Same Street with Me". The Denny is a very distinctly early 1897 Columbia titled "Then and Now". 
There were two Clarinet solos by William Tuson which really got me excited! I have a lot of love for those Issler soloists, as they were fantastic musicians that really stood out from the rest of the musicians in the orchestras. 
The two Tuson's were "Southern Plantation Echoes" from 1897 and "Old Black Joe" from 1897-98. Both of these records are online, but the ones I got in the mystery box are definitely different takes. There are some distinct differences between my takes and the ones I've heard online, which is great! To give you an idea, here are the two Columbia takes of these online:
"Old Black Joe"
"Southern Plantation Echoes"
My take of "Southern plantation echoes" is the longest one of the takes I've heard. It hovers right around the three minute mark and there's another chorus of the Tapioca played at the end. The clarinet and piano also alternate playing the Tapioca toward the end which is a really nice added touch. This take also sounds really nice, even on my crappy cheap old Columbia. 
There were a few Columbia orchestra records in the box too, such as an 1897 take of "Ecstasy Waltz"(with a cornet solo by Tom Clark!), and a curious recording of an unnamed "lanciers". 
There was also a super nice early 1897 take of "Stars and Stripes forever" by Sousa's Band, which added a nice touch to all the obscurities in the box. 
I know I'm missing a few to describe here, but I really want to get to the next part of this post. I will do another post once I know what everything is and when I know I can get decent electric transfers of them. I have already been given and offer to get them transferred!





All-right then!

Yesterday I had a serious aha! moment. Amid a moment of thoughtless listening(this is usually how is goes...), I realized something big. 
Many collectors try to grab those Blue American records when they can, as they're very attractive records that stand out from all others in pre-1910 recordings. I have quite a stack of them myself, this hot one included:
I am always amazed at their beauty. 
(in case you're wondering, this curious record is basically like one of Spencer's brown waxes with Hylands but half a decade later!)
Last night I went back and listened to the handful of American records that are online, and was reminded of how hot and tight their house orchestra was. Their orchestra was called the regimental band of the republic, which is quite a generic name for a studio ensemble. No one really knows who they were, as this company was shrouded in secrecy, but for good reason. They were started by a few sketchy Edison employees in 1904, but somehow these sketchy Edison workers managed to create the best sounding records of the era. Their records boom in ways that others just didn't! And how their orchestra did just that, and more!
so as many have been long wondering, who was the regimental band of the republic? Well, you know what, I may have come to a possible answer. 
That orchestra was just absolutely outstanding to all the other studio groups, with familiar sounding musicians. Who do they sound like the most?

Hager. 

Of course! It made so much sense once I started thinking through ways that could prove this idea. Before I go forth with the explanation, here are a few of their records:
Perhaps the hottest ever, "a Southern Belle(Cake-walk)"

"Cocoanut Dance"(written 1891)

"Princess Pocahontas"(buck dance)

Hager's own "Handsome Harry"

"1863 medley"

So why would it make sense that Hager could have led this this orchestra? They recorded "Handsome Harry" to start, which is Hager's piece from 1904. Of all the record insiders Hager would make the most sense in terms of having his hand in this mysterious and dreaded record company. Hager was part of the Climax scramble in 1901-1902, as he was working for Columbia-Climax-Zonophone when the tensions were boiling hot, but he was taking his orchestra to the more reliable and better quality Climax and Zon-O-Phone instead of Columbia. He managed to escape the battles over patents and record talent unscathed, but he gained ever more knowledge of the recording ropes and where the best fortune would be. With this heightened knowledge, Hager would have seen the great opportunities that American possessed. 
The sound of the orchestra on American nearly mirrors Hager's Zon-O-Phone orchestra from the same time period. This frame of 1904-1907 is also when Hager was working the most overall, so maybe this American notion went into his crowded work schedule. 
Also, I may add that the "1863 Medley" listed above sounds like many of hager's arrangements that were written down and the ones that were played at Zon-O-Phone around the same time. By this I'm meaning a tune of his like this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrdarM0xKgs
Indeed so. 

Now all of this is very tantalizing indeed, but it's just a possibility. No one really knows what was the deal with those American records, and another thing that particularly intrigues collectors of them is that orchestra announcer. That announcer was always so unenthusiastic and not theatrical about the announcements. It's a very familiar voice though, very recognizable to those who own some of these American records. That announcer very well could be someone in the band. But think about who would be right there with no instrument to keep his mouth shut...



Anyway, I think I'll end it here. I really want to do another blog post this week but I'll be traveling for a week, back this following Tuesday. When I return however, I will be giving a lecture on Hager! Let's hope that turns out all-right, there's quite a lot to cover with his long story...


Hope you enjoyed this!


















Wednesday, August 22, 2018

Fishing for Syncopation

One thing that has always been a source of interest for me has been finding traces of syncopation on records from before 1897. With a lot of new transfers being put up on Santa Barbara's website, there have been more examples of these records. Traces of syncopation are quite common as it turns out, more so than would be immediately expected with recordings of this age. Since I started to become interested in this music and these records, hearing Rag-Time on them became an overwhelming fascination for me. We can all dig through as much of the band and orchestra rag-time as we want, but to really grasp some of the clearest examples of authentic, rather eccentric, rag-time digging in the most unexpected places yield the best material. 
(the North American of "The Bell Buoy" by J. W. Myers, c.1893, from UC Santa Barbara)

Fishing is the right word it seems for this search for syncopation. This is because it's a hit or miss situation, though it's bound to happen sometimes. Recently, I went back and listened to many of the earliest records from North American and Edison, out of caution for the newly revealed fact that Frank P. Banta worked for North American starting in 1892. With that in place, I have been able to recognize similar characteristics to late 1890's Banta on some of these early records. Of course I'm going out and saying that he's on all those North American records from 1892-1894, but he's likely on many of them now that we know. Much of the syncopated style that's present on some of those North American records is now likely to be Banta, rather than the well-assumed to be Issler. Of course this period of time is very hard to tell, since it's just after the point where the very detailed Edison-North American ledgers drop off. But no matter, we still have our ears to listen! 
Now the most recent record that I found on my fishing trip for syncopation is one of the most outstanding examples I've ever heard.  Here's the link to the record:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjch0xipuDs

So the first thing to note here, is how the piano player starts playing in the middle of the announcement. When I first heard this record I assumed that was a keen indication of Banta, since the time frame for the record would indicate a very green Banta in terms of recording experience. That made set the year to 1892 at first, according to Banta's first year in recording. But after taking a few listens and being consulted by an expert in brown wax, 1893 seems more likely as the year. 
The second thing to note before I dig into the piano accompaniment is the singer. Of course it's very hard to tell who that singer is, as it's no one who was a regular in the studio around that time, though this singer is likely someone who wasn't a studio regular. The singer at points of the song actually rushes the rhythm just enough to make it almost swing. Yes, I mean it by using that. One example is at 1:28-1:29. Another good example is at 1:50-1:52. The last example is at 2:42-2:45. This may seem too slight to pick out but it's definitely noticeable, and significant enough to note. This sort of swing is pretty much exactly what Charles Asbury did on his records naturally. Just to hear the comparison, here's a great example by Asbury from 1895:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/16UwDuQli9LJ36hsiyAV5yTXXUF4js5IT/view?usp=sharing

All-right, now for the real reason I am still getting over my astonishment of this record, the piano accompaniment. Other than the weirdness at the very beginning in the announcement and the completely broken intro, the accompaniment is particularly interesting. There are plenty of very audible mistakes, which is fine, but part of the reason I think the pianist is a very young and green Banta. It's very nice to be able to hear all the low notes in the accompaniment, which adds a level of charm that is hard to describe. The first solo the pianist plays isn't too special, rather typical of accompaniment of that time, but the second solo is where it's at. 
That solo at 2:00 is absolutely shocking to hear. And here's why...
It may not be very syncopated, but it emulates those primitive march-rag-negro dances of the early and mid 1890's, with the first part of the solo sounding like a late-1890's rag pattern(even though it's technically looser a variation on the accompaniment done throughout the record). But what exactly does it sound like? Well I'll tell you, this is what:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_dI6BZt06U
It absolutely astounded me to hear such similarity, despite there being little syncopation, it's a much whiter take on the style that Scott Joplin and other early black rag pianists would have been playing as early as 1893(as according to Will Marion Cook!). The basic structure of the solo is similar to the infectious themes of Joplin's earliest rag compilations. 

And keep in mind that this record is from around 1893!
So with all that being said, I do not want you to think that I am certain the pianist is Banta, but one thing is for sure, that pianist is way too sloppy and eccentric to be Edward Issler. The pianist is very similar to Banta, as the style on this record is likely how a young and still musically forming Banta likely sounded. By 1897-1898, even as early as 1896 we can hear Banta having the same basic style as this 1893 record, but more refined and less sporadic. 

This record led me to thinking of and going back to listening to those records I have known for having syncopation on them. Another example(in fact one of the most overt ones I've heard), is Spencer's 1893-94 or so record of "Mamie Come Kiss your Honey Boy". 

(Spencer c.1888). 
This Spencer record has been a source of reference for me when looking for authentic syncopation on records before 1897. here's a link to the record just for reference:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0By7WuiOUrg7YSVN3QVBpZU4yUFRTLWVRYnZJZEdnanQtdW9B/view?usp=sharing
The smoothness of Spencer's syncopation is really something. All the syncopation on this record is solely done by Spencer, not the pianist. Though when fishing for syncopation on these records the vocalist is just as important as the accompaniment. What's particularly noteworthy about Spencer's singing on this is that he throws in two different kinds of syncopation, unlike using a single type and sprinkling it in one or maybe measures. We get the typical schottische syncopation at the beginning of each verse, but then we get little bits of the same swing that's all over Asbury's record throughout to make things interesting. 

The Spencer example has that more typical syncopation that's all over Schottisches of the 1850's-1890's, and in case you're unsure what exactly this rhythm is, you can hear it played several times on this 1894 Issler record:
 http://cylinders.library.ucsb.edu/search.php?queryType=@attr+1=1020&num=1&start=1&query=cylinder17058
While that type of rhythm was common, the typical cake-walk syncopation we know of wasn't either!
On this 1894-ish Issler record the overt cake-walk syncopation is played by the entire orchestra, which is nice to hear it emphasized so clearly:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1M77MA15X0lC02G4Qhy-PhYWtQ1_ZGz3K/view?usp=sharing
On the above Issler record, we can hear both types, but the cake-walk syncopation adds a level of interest to keep me listening, and of course I still haven't heard an Issler's orchestra record I don't like...
With Issler we already know that he was fully capable of playing smooth syncopation as early as 1889, so to hear him play both types so early with his orchestra, and likely as accompaniment, doesn't come as a surprise. But of course every example is one to note, add to the pile to use for proof later. 
Someone like Banta I would already assume to be playing syncopation of all types as early as 1893, because of his spotty musical upbringing, as well as his busy times working with Ossman. Banta was part of the generation that really boosted rag-time into white society, so I wouldn't put it past him to be playing such rhythms so early. 

When doing this fishing, sometimes things are a miss, records you would assume to be very interesting and have a fair amount if syncopation don't end up living to the expectations. Anything by George W. Johnson is a perfect example of this. Not every version of his four songs is as promising as his late-1890's Columbia's with Fred Hylands. His 1894-ish version of "The Laughing Song" that Santa Barbara put up recently is a great example of this. 
Here's that record:
http://cylinders.library.ucsb.edu/search.php?queryType=@attr+1=1020&num=1&start=1&query=cylinder17216
(it's rather messy, beware!)
This record should have bits of syncopation on it, but it's got the closest thing to it. Despite the absence of overt syncopation, the accompaniment is still very interesting, and rather eccentric. This record, just by the circumstances is likely another early Banta record. Though I would not really say the accompaniment is perfectly like Banta's style, the year in conjunction with the song's arranger(Banta!) would lead me to think it's him on piano, but do not quote me on that. 

When we get to 1896-97, the kind of syncopation that we hear in accompaniments is much different. This is when we get to the more familiar "rag" style. But as I've done previous posts on before, 1897 is still one of the most difficult years for pianist identification. The more 1897 Columbia's I hear, the more I lean to a single pianist style. I still am set on the assumption that Fred Hylands started working at Columbia by mid-1897 at the least, but I'm still trying to figure out where that cutoff would be exactly. Those "new York city" Columbia's are the most frustrating for me in terms of piano accompaniment. That time of mid-1897 at Columbia was when they had a few staff changes, pianists included. With those records that Ossman made for Columbia in 1897, I would place the pianist as being Banta, as they were still performing together onstage around that time, though for someone like Billy Golden, that's a different story. 
This leads me to get back to my nemesis record, Golden's 1897 Columbia of "Uncle Jefferson". 
http://cylinders.library.ucsb.edu/search.php?queryType=@attr+1=1020&num=1&start=1&query=cylinder11728
I still consider this record one of the earliest examples of serious rag-time piano accompaniment. 
For early 1897 it's rather raggy and eccentric. I am still bent on who that pianist is. Many of the characteristics sound like early Hylands, but still sound a little bit like Issler(or maybe George Schweinfest!). Now here's one thing for sure, the pianist on that "uncle Jefferson" is the same on this 1897 Columbia:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IqZr-mbGekuZjOWUTOvjf5q9kRcD4vc7/view?usp=sharing
Exactly the same kind of mid-bar syncopation is present here as the "Uncle Jefferson". 
The "uncle Jefferson" is certainly more sporadic and eccentric, but the eccentricity is similar in different parts of the accompaniment. After listening to lots of Banta recently, it occurred to me that I may have been blinded by my assumption of Banta only working for Edison. I know it's not the same song, but it's the other George W. Johnson hit--"The Laughing Coon"; this record I listened to recently and pulled apart again proved something with this conundrum. That pianist on the 1897 "Uncle Jefferson" may be Banta! I was so set in the idea that Banta didn't cross over that I was missing key characteristics that were evident of Banta. This record here has a lot of the same characteristics as the 1897 Columbia of "the Laughing Song" in the previous link:
http://cylinders.library.ucsb.edu/search.php?queryType=@attr+1=1020&num=1&start=1&query=cylinder15526
The main similarity here is in the smooth quick passages he plays at the end of every solo. 
So again, don't quote me on this, but Banta was likely one of the sub pianists they had at Columbia in that awkward period in 1897 before Hylands came along. Without Banta however, we wouldn't get some of the best early example of overt rag-time on records, such as his 1897 take of "Turkey in the Straw" with Billy Golden:
https://archive.org/details/TurkeybyGoldenwBanta1897
It's because of Banta that we get such oddly authentic examples of early syncopation on records, including his earliest recordings from 1892-1895. 
After 1897, we get all the good stuff. That's the cutoff for the more varied styles of rag-time showing up in piano accompaniments on records. Banta holds forth with the strange mix of itinerant and classically trained, whilst all the same we get Hylands and his dense, eccentric Ohio river valley/Chicago style that is like no other. 
Unfortunately Hylands' recording legacy has been neglected for over 100 years. Even in the era he lived his studio work was very rarely spoken of. It almost seems like those years he spent in the studio were like a dream. It was spoken of so highly when it happened and was re-imagined, but it vanished from all existence with the person who dreamt it. But I don't need to ramble down this path again...I've spoken plenty about the tragedy of the tragedian of Fred Hylands. 










Anyway...
This afternoon I listened to quite a few of those beloved Climax records, and noticed something. The pianist on those Climax records was always really nice and played dense accompaniments. For a long while I have assumed that to be Hylands, since it's so dense, complicated, and very rhythmic. Well, I listened to two versions of "a Rag-Time Skedaddle" recorded around the same time for Columbia, and Zon-O-phone, and noticed that they are the same pianist. 
Yes, Zon-O-Phone AND Columbia--same pianist. 
Here's the Columbia:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFRtiG6LyvY
And here's the Zon-O-Phone: 
https://soundcloud.com/jack-stanley-881056448/ragtime-skedaddle-frank-mazzlotta-1902?utm_source=soundcloud&utm_campaign=share&utm_medium=facebook
The pianist pretty much is playing exactly the same accompaniment. 
Okay, so I do not know who this pianist would be. But considering that it's Zon-O-phone and Columbia we're dealing with here, I would lean toard Fred Hager more than say Justin Ring. 
The reason I lean more toward Hager is because he had come kind of connections at Columbia as early as 1901, playing violin for them and all. 
With Justin Ring I wouldn't know. 
To further this unusual connection between Columbia-Climax-Zonophone, I listened to even more Climax records and Zon-O-Phone's back to back and noticed the same exact piano style on both. 
I listened to this one here:
back to back with a 1901 Zon-O-phone of John Terrell singing "Whistling Rufus", and they had the same rough an dense characteristics that give the Climax in the link above its charm. The most interesting thing is of course the whistling chorus at the end, with all sorts of interesting dense chords and bass note rhythm. 
A good comparison is another John Terrell record from around the same time as the Climax above:
The overall touch and characteristics are the same. Also, if you've heard many Zon-O-Phone's from around this time you'll recognize that dense piano accompaniment that always has chords that have lots of notes. Luckily the quality of those records caught all those essential notes. 

So, it seems that now when we come across a Columbia in a period of time where we know Hylands wasn't in New York, we can assume that pianist to be one of those strange Zon-O-Phone pianists. Now here's the thing about that pianists' style, it sounds a lot like Hylands' style, but it's most certainly not. Justin Ring wasn't extracted from a mid-western background, so I wouldn't expect him to sound similar to Hylands, however, Hager would. Hager had basically the same upbringing as Hylands, with his father even having the same occupation as Hylands(locomotive engineer), and starting to play music around the same time. Also, Hager was from far enough west to have a style similar to Hylands, when thinking in terms of regional piano(rag) styles. Hager was from rural Pennsylvania, which technically should yield a similar style to the neighboring state(Ohio), which is where Hylands' style was developed. 
Even the slightest characteristics like how (the pianist) plays the melody on this  Climax record at 1:00 in is significant:
It's slightly exaggerated and almost syncopated. That's very much like the Indiana/Ohio river valley style of Hylands, but that pianist for Climax is definitely not Hylands. 


I should quit it here, I've written much more than I thought on these matters for this post. 




Hope you enjoyed this! 










Monday, July 9, 2018

"33" and Ossman intrigue

What is meant by "33"? 

Well, when I use that number, that's what I use to refer to where Fred Hylands lived as a publisher in 1899 and 1900. In the past few weeks I've had a few important realizations about Hylands and the place that he was known for around the Columbia studio. 
When I first joined ancestry a few weeks ago, I didn't immediately go for the Hylands family, since I had already a very detailed understanding of them, and had most of the important paperwork to back up most things regarding them. The first family I went for was the Hager's(who originally spelled their name Hagar which makes sense). After a few hours of digging for other recording stars, I finally decided to test my knowledge of the Hylands family by digging a bit on them. Turns out that was a good idea. A few interesting things came up that I could never have guessed. 

So the name of this post is pertaining to 33, which was the house number for Fred's publishing firm on West 27th street in 1899. The building still stands there today as far as I know, and is currently awaiting someone to up and rent it. 
From the advertisement that Fred placed in The Phonoscope in 1899, it seems that his 33 had a few purposes, and not just limited to publishing. In his ad, we see Burt Green's name dropped in there as his main assistant. Here's a link to the ad just so you can really see it in all its glory:
Just as we see often in Hylands' endeavors, he was always open to having company at his location, and remaining ever social. This weakness of his led to a lot of issues, but it seemed that this was his source of extra income while working at Columbia. I had seen the 1900 census record before where Hylands and his wife were before, but until recently I hadn't been able to see whether or not he had some interesting guests crashed there.  Fred, Marie and his father Charles were listed at almost the very bottom of the page, so only two other boarders were shown to be there, a traveling salesman and his wife. Out of my burning curiosity, I flipped to the next page to see three more curious renters there. These three men weren't your typical laborers either. 
Here's who they were:
Noble Allen, a single Draper from the state of Georgia.

Louis Crotan, a single Traveling Salesman extracted from French Canada. 

Max Packer, a single Russian ladies' tailor.

Those aren't your typical young men of that time. When flipping to that page, I half expected to see someone from Columbia, whether it be a performer or engineer, but it's perhaps more interesting to see these rather Bohemian men living there with Fred and Marie at the time. Now what can we gather from these interesting people? Well, take notice that all these men are single, and they were all basically exactly the same age as Fred(27-28), and the wife of the first traveling salesman was English like Marie. Now try and put the pieces together. Clearly this was a partnership of its time, experimental, hot, and new. With Fred's father running the place, and collecting some of the rent from the young men(not including any songwriters or performers), it makes more sense what the dynamic of 33 was. This is a very progressive idea, but it was similar to the fashionable French way of living at that time. 
Father took care of the money, so that left Fred and Marie to run loose. This makes so much more sense now. Imagine 33 not too long before then, when Len Spencer was much more invested in the business, and likely crashing there at least twice a week, and getting to work with Fred much more often. By the middle of 1900, the firm was winding down, and things weren't looking so bright for Fred's vision. So I would imagine the time around when the census was taken was a wild time for Fred, aside from being at Columbia all the time. In the succeeding months Fred would sell most of his stock to a larger publishing firm and lose most of the love and trust he had in the Columbia staff and management. 
But with all this in mind, we can now apply this suspicion to other songwriters he worked with later, and as well as the ones he worked with around the same time. Speaking of that, I have tried multiple times to track down some of these illusive songwriters that Fred worked with, but have achieved no success in digging. I tried J. Grant Gibson, and Will J. Hardman, and wasn't able to find a thing on either of them. These two objects of Fred's affections will remain mysterious until something shows up on them. I know nothing and suspect next to nothing about Grant Gibson. I only know that Hylands and Gibson were both white rats, and that Gibson had known Fred far longer than the year of their 1912 piece:
Gibson's name shows up here and there when digging into Hylands' Broadway history, which almost guarantees Gibson was a white rat that Hylands bossed around while in his leading position. 


Anyway, I hope you all get the drift here regarding Hylands. Just think of how popular experimental types of marriages were in the 1890's, and that now it seems that Fred's was no exception, and this particularly makes sense considering their theatrical line. 





Now to move on to some intrigue!
(Ossman around 1891-92)
Vess Ossman will forever have a special place in my heart, because his grave was the first of these recording stars I visited. It was particularly emotional for me to set those roses on his modest headstone, after it had been covered in dirt for decades--almost forgotten. 

Before I searched up Hylands on ancestry, I of course wanted to see what there was on Ossman that I didn't already know. Turns out there's quite a large family out there. Not only are there lots of Ossman's, but there are plenty of Ossman's wife Eunice's family out there too. That's a good thing, that means there are plenty of people to potentially talk to regarding Vess. Hopefully I'll work up the nerve to do that sometime rather soon. While it may be good that there are plenty of Ossman's out there, this can also lead to issues trying to cross reference the information to make sure everything lines up alright. There are multiple entries for Ossman, from different sides of the extended family, so it took me awhile to really get the information right. 

I had known before that the Ossman's had unfortunate luck with their children. Only four of their seven children lived to be older than 5. Yes this was common in that time, but it's still hard luck regardless. It makes sense why they were so avid with having children when considering where Eunice ended up being buried. Just today I visited the location where Eunice was buried in 1930, and it happened to be at the nicest Catholic cemetery nearest where I live. Her grave was unfortunately unmarked, but I did find the exact location. I had some time in peace to think about their marriage, and how it was similar to one that I have already tried cracking open. Thinking over the scandalous skipping of town by Ossman, it reminded me of the whole running joke that was passed around the Columbia staff regarding Spencer's love life. In Walsh's Spencer article(the longest one), it is recalled that the boys at Columbia made fun of how Spencer had run off with his first wife(Margaret), without getting the go-ahead to marry her. 
This is actually similar to Ossman. He pulled the same thing with Eunice, though in his case the girl was younger, in fact too young to legally marry him when they skipped town in 1890. The more I thought about this, the more similarities I saw between Ossman and Len Spencer. Both of them went through quite a lot to be with the women they married, and at first loved them truly. As awful as this may sound, hear me out with this...
After all the trouble they went through, they ended up fulfilling the religious rite of their wives, basically just using them. This would be in typical fashion of the time period of course. Do not assume that I am calling offense to this, as it is common to see such a thing when studying this period of time. In this case, I call for the observation of another other than Len Spencer pulling this, the similarities are astonishing. With this in mind, it becomes clearer why Ossman and Spencer were good friends for so long. 

Now let's step to some more interesting intrigue, rather than theoretical musings. While digging around on the most reliable and detailed Ossman page on ancestry, there didn't appear to be any surprises, until it seems that old Vess had a son with an unknown woman that wasn't his beloved Eunice. 
How Scan'lous!
This is exactly the intrigue that I'd expect from Ossman. While it initially came as a surprise, it made sense and didn't jar me so much. It's curious also to see the date that all this intrigue came down, which was in 1917, rather late for Vess to be fooling around. Consider that 1917 was when Vess was performing with the Eight Victor Artists along with Arthur Collins and the crew. Such fooling around I would expect from Ossman in the mid-1890's, while he was touring with Banta as his accompanist, not in the later teen's while his performing was winding down. This paints Ossman to be much like a Mike Bernard type, but a little less wild and quick to make decisions. With this in mind, we can now consider Ossman as one of those authentic Rag-Timers of the 1890's, just like many of those rag composers we love.




Whew! The analysis in this post ended up being heavier than expected...
Just to diverge from all of that, here's a great new transfer from Santa Barbara with some fantastic Banta piano accompaniment: 
The beginning and end of this record is really where it's at. Banta plays some typical schottische melodies and rhythms, but they're played so aggressively and quickly that it attracts much of the attention on the record, even more than much of Dudley's singing to be honest. It's always nice to hear Banta play song and dance tunes such as this one. His strange sense of rhythm also comes through very well in his intro on this record, with the measure counting and rhythm a little out of whack, which adds to the eccentric charm of Banta's playing on many records. 


Next post I will dig into the new Hager discoveries! Stay tuned everyone!




Hope you enjoyed this!